|
Vintage Television and Video Vintage television and video equipment, programmes, VCRs etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
16th Mar 2017, 5:13 am | #1 |
Pentode
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: County Durham, UK.
Posts: 243
|
PYE Chelsea CT200
Hi guys , I'm at present trying to restore an 18 inch PYE Chelsea, this set is giving me a few head aches, after replacing the broken sliders and a few out of spec electrolytics powering up was short as the picture gradually got bigger as if it was ballooning so I powered off so not to cause any damage. I fear I may have been too late, the BU105 was s/c & the tuning capacitor 2.4n was leaky.
After replacement of the above the set now blows the HT fuse and R655 47ohm gets hot I have failed to find any s/c of any kind but I think this may be caused by failure of the LOPT. Any suggestions would be appreciated Chris |
16th Mar 2017, 7:54 am | #2 |
Heptode
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 989
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
It could be a faulty tripler loading the line stage..... as to other suggestions, maybe throw it in the bin!
Not a favourite set of mine. Never seemed to be able to produce a good picture , and ballooning was an original feature of these sets. Good luck with it though, there can't be many of these left now. Cheers. SimonT
__________________
The honesty of imperfection.......... |
16th Mar 2017, 10:18 am | #3 |
Pentode
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 131
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
I would also suggest disconnecting the tripler,
also check the mica washer (if fitted i cannot remember) under the BU105 These were great looking sets and sold well on the reconditioned market but had absolutely lousy eht regulation. Steve |
16th Mar 2017, 1:01 pm | #4 |
Pentode
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: County Durham, UK.
Posts: 243
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
One of the first things I went for was the tripler , even with this disconnected the fault is still the same .
I must admit I haven't checked the mica washer this will be next on my list Cheers Chris |
16th Mar 2017, 1:28 pm | #5 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Willington, County Durham, UK.
Posts: 1,499
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Hi Chris, i should have a nos loptx for this chassis. I will have a look, Malc.
__________________
Malc Scott |
16th Mar 2017, 2:10 pm | #6 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newport, Gwent, UK.
Posts: 962
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
I've got the Philips version of this chassis. but i've yet to power it up so don't know what horrors await me .
Cheers Neil. |
16th Mar 2017, 3:26 pm | #7 | ||
Pentode
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: County Durham, UK.
Posts: 243
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Quote:
Quote:
Cheers Chris |
||
16th Mar 2017, 3:47 pm | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Wales, UK.
Posts: 6,921
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Hi
That and the terrible IF unit! To repair you remove the IF sub-panel, then heat, lift slightly and resolder all the small capacitors inside - they were placed too close to the double-sided print. Don't expect too much from these sets, though they were greatly improved (not a difficult task) by the introduction of the CT200/1 with the HV focus CRT. The unipotential ones were very poor. Pye obviously thought that picture ballooning was a desirable feature at the time - witness the 697 chassis. Always be careful when buying a 20" G8 560 that it isn't actually an 18" 570. You will be very disappointed (I speak from experience - the £30 still hurts!) Am I imagining things or was there a Television article that experimented with feeding a unipotential tube with a 'proper' focus voltage? Glyn |
16th Mar 2017, 5:37 pm | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Only remember the uni potential CRT, they were so poor compared to the similar size screens of Hitachi and Toshiba that the sets we ordered were sent back as unacceptable.
Frank |
10th May 2017, 10:37 pm | #10 |
Nonode
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redruth, Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 2,573
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Hi.
I'm trying to recall which sets employed these sub-standard unipotential focus CRTs. The only ones that I can think of were the Pye CT200/Philips 570 and the Thorn 8000. I'm sure there must have been others but I can't immediately think of any. Regards Symon. EDIT: I always recall the terrible flaring on those tubes, usually the red gun was worst affected. If the contrast and brightness were kept reasonably low then a fair picture could be displayed. Those sets were only really viewable in a darkened room. Last edited by Philips210; 10th May 2017 at 10:49 pm. Reason: Additional text. |
10th May 2017, 11:00 pm | #11 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
Posts: 453
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
I had a Ferguson fitted with the 8000 chassis in the late 80's. I'm sure it was 18 inch so probably used the unipotential CRT. The whole set looked very old fashioned with a mechanical tuner, but the picture was excellent. Did I get lucky?
|
11th May 2017, 5:01 pm | #12 |
Nonode
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redruth, Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 2,573
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Hi.
From memory there was a 17" Thorn 8000 which had the unipotential focus CRT. There was a 8000A chassis with slight mods inc the mains dropper but I can't recall what CRT that set had. I think there was an 18" 8000 or 8000A but it's too far back in the distant past to be sure. I do know that the 19" 8500 had a normal HV focus CRT and that generally gave a very respectable picture. Regards Symon. |
11th May 2017, 5:05 pm | #13 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Wales, UK.
Posts: 6,921
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Yes! I bought one in the late Seventies with pocket money I'd saved (£25) only to discover the CRT was beyond help. The Ferguson 3717 did look old-fashioned with a sort of American influence. The ones for rental were much more conventionally styled.
Many Japanese sets from the Seventies used low focus CRTs (e.g Hitachi CBP180) but despite looking a bit soft were nowhere near as bad as the Pye. The Decca Bradford 18" used this CRT in the early version, later adopting a proper tube. The light cabinets were usually the early sets - all were denoted CS1830. The Bush 18" used a high-focus PIL tube whose picture - if not its reliability - could at last give the Japanese sets a run for their money. Glyn |
11th May 2017, 8:20 pm | #14 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Posts: 632
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Who made these unipotential tubes? I have never seen a set with this kind of tube.
|
12th May 2017, 8:18 am | #15 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
The ones I saw came from Japan, but they had Mullard labels on them in the Pye sets.
The Hitachi sets had their name on them, I suppose Hitachi could have made there own but have no evidence either way. The CT200 was an awful set, the Hitachi sets did have a softer picture than the high voltage focus type but very acceptable and extremely reliable. Frank |
12th May 2017, 12:30 pm | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Wales, UK.
Posts: 6,921
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
I had a feeling the 18" ones were supplied by Toshiba but I'm not sure. It seems they were a success in a well designed TV like the Hitachi.
And in the Pye? Hmmm. Glyn |
13th May 2017, 10:45 pm | #17 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Posts: 632
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
What do you mean by "soft picture"? Lack of focus and/or contrast?
|
13th May 2017, 11:04 pm | #18 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
That's the way I would describe it but not that bad as it spoiled the picture, in fact customers did not notice it on the Hitachi sets.
Frank |
15th May 2017, 12:03 pm | #19 | |
Pentode
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: County Durham, UK.
Posts: 243
|
Re: PYE Chelsea CT200
Quote:
Chris |
|