14th Oct 2014, 2:41 pm | #21 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Hi David, thanks for replying again. First screen shot show centre frequency of zero, 1MHz span. Hard to catch maximum noise, it's constantly varying. Second shot shows Max Hold switched in, after about 10 seconds, same settings.
Some more info, noise level is similar on both input sockets. If I had to say, I would venture that switching through attenuation levels is most likely to clear the noise. I just looked at it (been running with the test signal imputed for a few hours) and the noise was gone or much less. When I scrolled through attenuation positions, just for a few times, it came back.
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY Last edited by Chris Wilson; 14th Oct 2014 at 2:48 pm. |
14th Oct 2014, 3:40 pm | #22 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Occasionally when switching between input sockets, with the input to the N type 100kHz to 1.5GHz one, the signal is shown attenuated. Repeatable, but infrequent.
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
14th Oct 2014, 11:42 pm | #23 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
It looks like there's still something wrong then...
My max hold was much cleaner on the same test and I could leave it for ages without seeing much of a change. My 8568B definitely has issues with the AC/DC selector if I leave it unused for a long time. The attenuator also has an issue and this is most easily seen when returning to the 10dB setting on mine. If the analyser hasn't been used for ages it will show more than 10dB attenuation for maybe half a second and then it kind of integrates up to the correct level after another second or so. It only does this on the 10dB setting so I'm pretty sure it's the attenuator. However, it only takes about 5 or 6 clicks in and out to make it totally reliable again for a few months or so. It looks like your analyser still has an intermittent connection/component but it might not be the attenuator because it shows the spurious at zero Hz.
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU |
15th Oct 2014, 8:03 am | #24 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Yes, the aim of that test was to eliminate everything in front of the mixer.
The next logical tests are to go to zero span and look for amplitude fluctuations. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
15th Oct 2014, 8:11 am | #25 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
I tried zero span yesterday, but I am not sure if zero span with otherwise the current settings is an ideal check or not. Using otherwise similar settings I get an unwavering flat line.
Leaving the machine on all day (with a very dim display to stop screen burn) seems to result in a more stable general display than when it's first turned on from standby. I am looking for a source for the service manual to better understand the signal paths. Thanks again.
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
15th Oct 2014, 12:10 pm | #26 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Service manual (set of 4) ordered from Dave at Artek Manuals for download. God help me.....
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
15th Oct 2014, 1:04 pm | #27 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Should be free on the Agilent website. Most non-current HP stuff is.
OK, in zero-span mode, you have a fixed-tuned radio receiver (rather a fancy one) You can tune to the centre of the zero hertz response and use different bandwidths and also dB/division to look for things that could be gain fluctuations dowm the receiver chain. This would show bad connections.. cracklies You can tune of of the zero hertz response (right off) and look for things which jump out of the noise and this would find sources of noise not dependent on signals. You can tune down the slope of the filter response (which is the shape you see for that zero hertz response and use it as a 'Slope Demodulator' to demodulate FM. This will allow you to see FM jumps and things if something noisy is modulating the tuning of any of your LOs. A noisy opamp/resistor etc tuning your YIG or a later oscillator will show up here. The coil driver circuits are a bit prone to running hot and drying out tant capacitors. A spectrum analyser is a fabulous machine for troubleshooting thiings and diagnosing faults. You can do a lot by turning it on itself David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
16th Oct 2014, 12:40 pm | #28 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
OK thanks David, although I must admit some of that has gone a bit over my head
I am wondering if this noise is electro- mechanical, as on a 10kHz frequency span I can gently tap the front panel and I see immediate noise spikes on the trace. I can also alter or sometimes totally stop the noise at a 1MHz span by tapping. This video sounds like I am beating the hell out of it, but the microphone gain was far too high, they are actually gentle taps on the front panel. It's not the calibrator cable or connectors, it's something internal, and I am suspecting a loose SMA or even a duff input switching relay. I am girding my loins to delve inside the brute. Maybe bypass the input switching relay altogether if nothing loose is apparent. The video is in MP4 format, rather badly focused, but should give the idea: http://www.chriswilson.tv/8568B_noise.mp4 There's a used microwave input switching relay of the right part number for sale in the US, but is there any chance of a new one still being available?
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
16th Oct 2014, 12:48 pm | #29 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Search for the Hewlett Packard Journal archive and search for the 8568A and you should find some good reading material on how your box works and how it was designed.
If it's a mechanical crackly, responds to tapping, and it shows up on the zero-hertz response, you are well on the way. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
16th Oct 2014, 1:16 pm | #30 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Centre frequency 20MHz and zero span isn't noisy, and tapping makes no difference to the line's amplitude
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
16th Oct 2014, 10:37 pm | #31 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
I'm not sure how hard/soft you are tapping the RF unit but it's unrealistic to not expect some microphony effects on the first LO when you tap the RF unit. The loop bandwidth is quite wide but I don't think this will make it immune to microphony.
However, in your video I can see a few spurious terms that appear even when you are not tapping the unit. Presumably these are due to the original spurious issue. So most of what you see in your tapping test might be 'normal' LO1 microphony and not the same thing that is causing the original spurious issue.
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU |
17th Dec 2014, 2:02 pm | #32 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
A fear of making matters worse, and a lack of time has seen me ignore this machine, plus a lack of true understanding of its very complex operation at the component level, of course!
However, I had to use the 8568B again yesterday, noise and all, and I have seen an issue that may, or may not, shine more light on things. I was trying to measure a signal level at 137kHz. I found the -29dBm hard to believe, it should have been more. I then used the inbuilt 20MHz source which is supposed to be -10dBm as a check. It showed a -10dBm signal, as expected. I then used two different good quality sig gens to inject signals at known levels. I used plain sine waves. Once you get down around 5Mhz and lower in frequency the display and readout gets more and more incorrect, reading lower and lower as frequency gets lower. I then tried 1Ghz into it, and that was correct. So the lower the frequency (and I could see if it changes at a particular level, suddenly), the more low it reads. Does that give any additional clue please? May I wish you all a happy Christmas and a prosperous and healthy New Year and thank you all sincerely for your patient help over this and other matters during 2014. All the very best to you and yours.
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
17th Dec 2014, 2:58 pm | #33 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Further info
Accurate sig gen, sine wave out all at -10dBm 20MHz - -10dBm shown on 8568B 10MHz - -9.9dBm 5Mhz - -10.6dBm 1MHz - -14.4dBm 500kHz - -19.1dBm 100kHz - -32.6dBm 10kHz - -52.5dBm 1kHz - -5.2dBm At 1Khz centre marker showed 0Hz, and frequency counter also showed 0Hz. Centre marker and counter correct for previous frequency inputs. When I removed the signal lead from the HP8568B with 1kHz going into it, the 8568B display kept running as if the signal was still present!
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
17th Dec 2014, 4:02 pm | #34 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,062
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
20db / decade is 1st order RC. Is the analyser DC coupled ?
dc |
17th Dec 2014, 4:04 pm | #35 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
I am running it with a DC block on the input Dave. Is that wrong for these tests? Running into the N type input on the right.
This one, or one very similar: http://www.rfshop.co.uk/dc-nmnf0-5g100v50-dc-block.html
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
17th Dec 2014, 10:53 pm | #36 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
It all depends on the value of the capacitor in that DC block adaptor. It will definitely cause a 20dB/decare roll off at low frequencies. THe question is where does it start?
The advert has no data about the thing itself, only the price and their stock level. You could measure the capacitance from inner socket on one end to the pin on the other. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
17th Dec 2014, 11:54 pm | #37 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
This is the datasheet for the one mentioned. From the figures quoted it is almost certainly the DC block that is causing the roll off you are experiencing.
http://www.jyebao.com.tw/pdfpath/DC-NMNF0-5G100V50.pdf Al
__________________
I won't tell you how I discovered that. |
17th Dec 2014, 11:56 pm | #38 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
A lot of DC blocks like that are spec'd from 10MHz to a few GHz. So the LF rolloff you are seeing is probably normal.
However, the N type input port on the HP8568B is already DC blocked to 50V internally so you don't normally need to worry about fitting a DC block here. Can you try without the DC block (assuming you have < 50V DC on your input connection) Note: The alternative BNC input port to the HP8568B does not have a DC block so you can easily damage the analyser with external DC if you use this port. You can get DC blocks that work well down to just a few kHz. For my old 22GHz HP8566B I bought a high quality DC block (N type) that works from about 100kHz to 18GHz with very low VSWR. It wasn't cheap but it does prevent damage from external DC as the HP8566B has a 0V DC limit on the input port.
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU |
18th Dec 2014, 12:42 am | #39 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
Thanks everyone, it was the DC block, it gives readings that tally with the sig gen, level wise, with it out. I have never had cause to use it at below 10Mhz before, but my new found interest in the LF bands means I need to either be very careful with it or buy a better block like Jeremy's.
I was half hoping it was a part of the noise issue and would help to locate the problem. Mea culpa, apologies.
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
18th Dec 2014, 1:55 am | #40 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: HP8568B calibrator noise / spurious signals
A block with a larger capacitor will be fine for your LF work because you already have that >10MHz job for when you want to go high. THe bigger capacitor will go bad at a lower frequency than the smaller capacitance one will. A lot of my blocks and accessories are in APC3.5 which makes N look economical.
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |