View Single Post
Old 24th Jan 2021, 7:35 pm   #1
Graham G3ZVT
Dekatron
 
Graham G3ZVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 18,724
Default An active xDSL micro-filter

I have posted about this in "Modern Technology", but I want to explore the implications for our vintage telephony.

I've had this filter for ages and I've been using it on my VDSL setup on the basis that it's the best one I have, after all, it has a good few semiconductor devices in it, and not merely passive, so it must be good, right?

After examining it closely, I'm not at all sure of that.

Hear is the item, it's quite a big beast.

Click image for larger version

Name:	filter4.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	60.0 KB
ID:	225296


As far as I can ascertain it was made by LEA (leacom.fr)


The four devices that I thought were transistors turned out to be BT134-600 triacs.

Click image for larger version

Name:	filter f.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	85.2 KB
ID:	225297 Click image for larger version

Name:	filter b.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	104.9 KB
ID:	225298

I reversed engineered, it and produced this schematic.

Click image for larger version

Name:	schematic.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	52.5 KB
ID:	225299


So, as I see it, as a filter, it's very basic . Just two small inductors one in each leg and a common-mode choke. I have better filters with more ferrite, if weight is any indication.

So what of the rest of it?

I don't know why they needed this symmetrical arrangement of four triacs to do the job, but what seems to be happening is if the phone or other POTS equipment is on hook, then the triacs switch off, and isolate the phone port from the incoming line. But why? What part of "on-hook" don't I understand?

Well, you might say, some phones are designed to abstract a small current from the line when on-hook to retain number memory or even recharge a small battery. But If this filter prevented that, it would hardly be a Good Thing.

So all in all, I'm a bit perplexed. Do you agree with my interpretation of what's happening?
Can you enlarge on it?
__________________
--
Graham.
G3ZVT
Graham G3ZVT is offline