Re: Cable impedance upper limit in Radcom Plus?
He claims that infinitesimal inner diameter does not get you there either. I can't remember why.
The problem with this type of article is that the details of the actual technical claims are either missing or expressed so vaguely that it is difficult to refute. A clear argument gives critics the opportunity to pinpoint the precise point in the argument where a mistake has been made, but 'trust me, I have read the original papers and they agree with me' is not very helpful.
I will continue to assume that he is wrong, unless someone can come up with good reasons why I should believe him. Genuine new theories in radio engineering are more likely to be published by IEEE or IET than RSGB or ARRL.
|