UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Specific Vintage Equipment > Television Standards Converters, Modulators etc

Notices

Television Standards Converters, Modulators etc Standards converters, modulators anything else for providing signals to vintage televisions.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 3rd May 2015, 11:44 am   #1
high_vacuum_house
Octode
 
high_vacuum_house's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Belper Derbyshire
Posts: 1,935
Default Protecting the Aurora RF output

Good morning,
I have just purchased an aurora from Crowthorn tubes. I was thinking if there is a suitable method to protect the RF output should the aerial isolator caps or the insulation around the aerial socket fail shoving some nasty things back into the RF input.

I was thinking something like a small box with a UHF plug and socket with 2 low pf capacitors wired between them effectively ensuring that no DC or 50hz signals could get back to the RF output. Would this work or would something else be needed.
Many thanks,
Christopher Capener
__________________
Interests in the collection and restoration of Tefifon players and 405 line television
high_vacuum_house is offline  
Old 3rd May 2015, 12:41 pm   #2
dazzlevision
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Near Swindon, North Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 3,608
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Hello,

Many UK made colour TVs used an isolated aerial input socket, combined with a short coax lead terminated with a coax plug, to the UHF tuner RF input. These would be ideal. An example would be those used in the Thorn/Ferguson TX9 chassis.

Regards,

Dazzlevision
dazzlevision is offline  
Old 3rd May 2015, 3:56 pm   #3
Rubberfingers
Pentode
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dorset, UK.
Posts: 240
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

You can buy isolated TV aerial sockets, intended for wall mounting in buildings, you could use one of these http://www.speedyelectrical.co.uk/1....FSQewwodMLkA2w (no connection with supplier, etc, just first Google hit looking for an example) Make sure you get an isolated one though, as there are non isolated ones available.
Rubberfingers is offline  
Old 3rd May 2015, 7:55 pm   #4
kan_turk
Hexode
 
kan_turk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 398
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Just a word of caution - output of aurora is VHF (at least 405 line version) and many (but not all) isolators are designed for UHF and may introduce significant loss at VHF. While this not be a problem as output level of aurora is very high it should be borne in mind. Better to get an isolator intended for the wider European market which will be intrinsically VHF/UHF if you can.
Just a few words of advice based on my own experience.

Best regards
John
kan_turk is online now  
Old 3rd May 2015, 11:16 pm   #5
Duke_Nukem
Octode
 
Duke_Nukem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

I have an aurora and connect the RF via a couple of caps - 10nF 600V ceramic if memory serves but chosen simply because they were to hand, much smaller cap values will work just as well. I usually add an additional 18db attenuator for most sets simply because there is just so much signal.

TTFN,
Jon
Duke_Nukem is offline  
Old 5th May 2015, 3:20 pm   #6
kan_turk
Hexode
 
kan_turk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 398
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Just to be very clear - as far as I am concerned safety of humans comes first so ground side of Aurora output connector must have a continuous dc path to antenna isolating connector where the isolation from potentially live chassis takes place (including through any splitters, amplifiers or attenuators etc in the path) - isolating capacitors in the RF live (centre) conductor of Aurora are advantagous but I would advise higher voltage rating (c 1.5Kv).
The problem with this sort of issue is that many schemes will work ie equipment will function but it will not be safe. Apologies for labouring the point but it needs to be made and is pften not adequately understood.

Regards
John
kan_turk is online now  
Old 5th May 2015, 3:52 pm   #7
kalee20
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,078
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Can you not make a little RF transformer with a small ferrite toroid and some insulated wire? With plenty of RF available, matching and losses should not be an issue, and you'll have full galvanic isolation.
kalee20 is offline  
Old 5th May 2015, 6:35 pm   #8
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,996
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Right behind the RJ45 port of any 'Gigabit Ethernet' equipped PC or laptop motherboard is a quad 1:1 ferrite isolating transformer with usually at least a 1Kv isnulation rating.

Not sure if these will work up to UHF but I've successfully used them in the past as couplers for a 28-to-50MHz double-balanced modulator [diode ring] in an amateur-band transverter without excess loss.
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 5th May 2015, 9:26 pm   #9
Synchrodyne
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Papamoa Beach, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Posts: 2,944
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Would a commerical "braid breaker" type unit work in this case? These are usually 1:1 RF isolating transformers for 75-ohm lines packaged with Belling Lee or F connectors. I am not sure who makes them these days. I have some from AKD, but these would be from around 25 years ago.

As they are designed primarily to block interference, I guess it would be necessary to check their AC voltage blocking capability.

Cheers,
Attached Files
File Type: pdf AKD Braid Breaker.pdf (106.3 KB, 770 views)
Synchrodyne is offline  
Old 10th May 2015, 3:07 pm   #10
winston_1
Hexode
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 498
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Quote:
Originally Posted by kan_turk View Post
Just a word of caution - output of aurora is VHF (at least 405 line version) and many (but not all) isolators are designed for UHF and may introduce significant loss at VHF.
That sounds very short sighted if it is true. Surely any isolator sold should be OK for band 2 at least.
winston_1 is offline  
Old 10th May 2015, 6:05 pm   #11
kan_turk
Hexode
 
kan_turk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 398
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

You'd think so but I'm afraid this is not the case -
kan_turk is online now  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 7:23 pm   #12
Restoration73
Nonode
 
Restoration73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Surbiton, SW London, UK.
Posts: 2,801
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

I believe the Aurora does produce harmonics, and a transformer will have a frequency
cutoff that might be useful - not expensive
http://uk.farnell.com/coilcraft/pwb1...mhz/dp/2458064
Restoration73 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 7:39 pm   #13
KeithsTV
Nonode
 
KeithsTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,573
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

The Aurora certainly creates a lot of harmonics well into the UHF TV spectrum.

In the 2013 Golborne talk on Alignment I showed the Aurora spectrum which is in the notes for the talk.

https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/...=100384&page=2

There's also a table showing what combinations of band 1 & 3 channels should be avoided in a 2 channel system due to the harmonics of the band 1 signal falling in band 3.

Keith
KeithsTV is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 7:27 pm   #14
jonathanbaldry
Diode
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Boston, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 8
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

I have overcome this worry by running my 405 line Emerson on a mains isolation transformer.

Jonathan.
jonathanbaldry is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2015, 5:18 pm   #15
Heatercathodeshort
Dekatron
 
Heatercathodeshort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Warnham, West Sussex. 10 miles south of DORKING.
Posts: 9,147
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

If you are really concerned about this I would suggest something along the lines of this birds nest that I knocked up a few moments ago. The input and output coils are four turns each wound on a ferrite ring. They need to be 'in phase' easily checked by swapping over one pair of leads of either the primary or secondary coils.[but not both!]
There is a slight attenuation of the signal but the AURORA has more than enough output to cope with the minor reduction in output.
It could be fitted in a small die cast box for neatness.
Some experimentation may be needed depending on the core material as there are many variations in 'Ferroxcube'.
The picture was taken on a 1950 Murphy V180. This chassis does not have vision AGC so a good comparison can be made. Just an idea, John.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Isolation..jpg
Views:	241
Size:	45.1 KB
ID:	116506   Click image for larger version

Name:	Isolation. (1).jpg
Views:	308
Size:	55.1 KB
ID:	116507  
Heatercathodeshort is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2015, 5:49 pm   #16
Radio Wrangler
Moderator
 
Radio Wrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,864
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

You can buy isolating transformers designed to pass TV signals and to break both the inner and braid paths, already housed and fitted with Belling-Lee connectors. Available from amateur radio suppliers under the name "Braid breakers"

David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done
Radio Wrangler is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 10:19 am   #17
Mark James
Hexode
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chorley, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 260
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Would this do the job http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/231800074179 - if so how would one wire it?

Mark
Mark James is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 10:33 pm   #18
Gridiron
Heptode
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 662
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Looking at the specifications, the response of these transformers starts to roll off above 3.5 MHz so probably not much good at TV RF frequencies (41 MHz and above ), loads of signal attenuation.
Mike.
Gridiron is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2016, 10:38 am   #19
Mark James
Hexode
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chorley, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 260
Default Re: Protecting the Aurora RF output

Thanks for the advice.

Mark
Mark James is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 1:23 am.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.