|
Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc) Amplifiers, speakers, gramophones and other audio equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
28th Nov 2015, 3:29 pm | #1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 2
|
Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
I've just dug out my trusty NAD 3020 amp from last century (confined it to the loft when it couldn't cope with all the peripheries), anyway I have a question to put, hope nobody minds?
Front of NAD a button states PHONO, I do not have my DUAL 505 anymore, so can I use the connections for example a CD? Front of NAD a button states TAPE my reel to reel and Cassette player have gone, is it possible to use these connections for my lovely MINIDISK player? Front of NAD a AUX button. Your thoughts on the above would be most appreciated. |
28th Nov 2015, 3:34 pm | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,787
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
The phono input is for a magnetic cartridge and applies RIAA equalisation. It can't be used with anything else.
The tape connections can be used with anything with a line level input/output. The aux input is a line level input which is normally used with a CD player. |
28th Nov 2015, 3:42 pm | #3 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 2
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Cheers paulsherwin, just letting the amp get to room temperature before firing it up, all my separates are over 30 years old, do they qualify as vintage?
|
28th Nov 2015, 4:43 pm | #4 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,074
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
That's a good question. When I saw the thread I thought NAD? Vintage? Do we have an age range that qualifies the term?
|
28th Nov 2015, 4:43 pm | #5 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Biggin Hill, London, UK.
Posts: 5,191
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Just for completeness (and I think Peter4076 should ignore this!) I seem to recall seeing designes for 'inverse RIAA networks' that would take a line level signal (such as from a CD player) and convert it into the raw RIAA signal you get from a magnetic pickup cartridge. Thus allowing you to use a redundant pickup input for a CD player or similar.
I am sure feeding the CD player into the AUX input is a lot simpler and will sound better, so that's what to do if you have an AUX input available. |
28th Nov 2015, 8:54 pm | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ramsbottom (Nr Bury) Lancs or Bexhill (Nr Hastings) Sussex.
Posts: 5,814
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
I think it's 25 years with exceptions roj but I might be wrong! That takes us to the end of the eighties-tempus fugit
Dave W |
28th Nov 2015, 9:49 pm | #7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,787
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Yes, we use a rule of thumb 'vintage' age of 25 years for most things, though we also use discretion at times. A 3020 certainly qualifies.
|
29th Nov 2015, 12:42 am | #8 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,074
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Thanks - that makes even my CD player vintage! And makes me feel even older!
|
29th Nov 2015, 1:17 am | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ramsbottom (Nr Bury) Lancs or Bexhill (Nr Hastings) Sussex.
Posts: 5,814
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
The rich and/or upper middle class buy quality and hang onto it Roj!
Think furniture! It's your mental age that really counts. "Each day just goes so fast You turn around it's past You don't get time to hang a sign on me!" The Beatles Revolver 50 years in 2016 Dave W |
1st Dec 2015, 9:49 pm | #10 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,192
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
I bought an NAD3020 in 1981, the first piece of "serious" audio equipment I ever purchased. It survived two house moves before being retired in favour of an NAD T761 Cinema Amp in 2001.
I brought it out of retirement earlier this year for use with a Freeview STB and a pair of Leak Sandwich Speakers. It still works well apart from a bit of mains hum.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
5th Feb 2016, 11:10 pm | #11 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK.
Posts: 103
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
I would use all the line inputs such as CD, tape, aux etc. for cd players, tuners, etc. but if you run out of inputs (easily done with freeview boxes, sky and dvd players connected as well) then the you can easily build a reverse RIAA filter. This allows you to plug a line level source into the redundant phono input on the NAD. The circuit is passive and requires no power. Here are a couple of links:-
http://www.epanorama.net/circuits/phono.html http://sound.westhost.com/project80.htm Alternatively, try the middle circuit of the photo below. |
6th Feb 2016, 1:56 am | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,787
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Probably easier to buy or build an external switch box though. You sometime find them at car boots or flea markets for little money.
|
6th Feb 2016, 9:09 am | #13 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Boston, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 993
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Quote:
While we're on the subject of the 3020 though (I'm rebuilding one at the moment), could I maybe ask a Q. regarding the phono input circuit - specifically why the early phono input stage uses, or was at least designed for, C407 & C411 in parallel (both are specified as 0.0015uF / 50V, Mylar) ? Was this intended to reduce esr, or is there some other potential advantage of using 2 in parallel instead of a single Mylar twice the size ? The main pcb is actually marked & drilled for both in parallel, although I've only come across a single 0.003uF Mylar cap actually being used in the couple of examples I've seen. Thanks, Alan |
|
6th Feb 2016, 9:33 am | #14 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,801
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Probably an attempt to use part values already used elsewhere on the board but later changed when view of costs changed.
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
6th Feb 2016, 11:06 am | #15 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Boston, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 993
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Cheers David - I'd not thought of that, and just assumed there was some techincal reason.
There's no similar values on the board, but I suspect you're right, there probably were on one of the other product lines in the same factory. Alan |
6th Feb 2016, 2:39 pm | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Evesham, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,241
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
1n5 is an E12 value, but 3n is an E24 value. The latter would have been less readily available, so a wise designer would have included both options on the PCB and let Purchasing fight it out!
Also, putting components in series or parallel improves the tolerance. A pair of cheap 10% capacitors of equal value would have a tolerance of 7% (10/root-2). Not sure if that was on the designer's mind, but it's certainly the trick Douglas Self uses in his RIAA preamps. |
13th Feb 2016, 9:34 am | #17 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Boston, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 993
|
Re: Reviving my pleasure of the past NAD 3020!
Thanks Mark - that's a good pointer. I just looked up some of the details of the Douglas Self RIAA pre-amps, it's interesting, and I can see I need to do a bunch more reading... but, it's good to see there probably is a good technical reason for the parallel caps, as well as cost.
In the mean time, I also found a photo of an early 3020, showing the parallel caps in position - so the early models apparently did indeed use them, presumably before purchasing won ! |