|
Vintage Radio (domestic) Domestic vintage radio (wireless) receivers only. |
|
Thread Tools |
7th Sep 2015, 11:30 pm | #61 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
Yes, the green wires need to be joined together (a little tidying-up of the soldering would not go amiss, while the set is still in pieces). They are the earth returns, and you want as near as you can get to a perfect connection. You have already inserted some series resistance with the "live" side of the signal.
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |
10th Sep 2015, 11:41 am | #62 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N.W. Oxfordshire(Chipping Norton)
Posts: 7,306
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
Here is a sketch showing how I add an 'aux-in' connection to stereo radios or radio/cassette players The procedure is the same for mono radios, except that a resistor of between 1 & 10 K is fitted in series with each channel, between the jack socket and 'radio/aux' switch. I may, time permitting!, post other diagrams/pictures later
|
10th Sep 2015, 11:58 pm | #63 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London & East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 118
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
So as It would happen I don't have a 470nf capacitor. Biggest non electrolytic is 220nf. Can I use that or not enough capacity?
Which is why I was curious as to how people came up with 470nf |
11th Sep 2015, 7:09 am | #64 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Basildon, Essex, UK.
Posts: 4,100
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
Try it and see what it sounds like, or double up with 2 in parallel.
Mike |
11th Sep 2015, 12:56 pm | #65 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London & East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 118
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
will do and report back.
|
11th Sep 2015, 11:40 pm | #66 |
Pentode
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sandviken, Sweden
Posts: 233
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
A too small capacitor will damp the high frequencies making the sound dull and muffled. An unneccesarily big capacitor will be more expensive and physically bigger but will cause no problems so long as it is "within reason".
This is calculated from circuit impedance, signal frequency and so on. A bit over my head but 470nf sounds reasonable. You can always try another value and see how it sounds. |
12th Sep 2015, 10:51 am | #67 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London & East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 118
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
I rigged it up on a breadboard as a test outside of the radio.
Now just got to be creative with finding a neat way of soldering in and keeping the resistors and capacitors tidy. I was thinking of using some heat shrink to insulate once satisfied it's all working? Sorry, meant to say: IT WORKS! VERY WELL! |
12th Sep 2015, 12:02 pm | #68 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Basildon, Essex, UK.
Posts: 4,100
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
That's good.
If there is not enough room in the radio I would get one of those little plastic boxes from somewhere like Maplin or Ebay to fit the components in. Mike |
12th Sep 2015, 6:01 pm | #69 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
|
Re: A frustrated Motorola
That's excellent!
Heat-shrink tubing would be one way of protecting your components from short-circuits. Alternatively, you could mount the parts on a small piece of Veroboard and fix this somewhere inside the set. Use a similar-sized piece of plastic cut from a CD box or something to insulate this from whatever is underneath it.
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |