View Single Post
Old 21st Mar 2017, 9:30 pm   #19
stevehertz
Dekatron
 
stevehertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,835
Default Re: Is Blu-Tack the magic cheapo option for non audiophiles?

Couldn't agree more Martin. But this stuff is not rocket science, the turntable, arm, cartridge (and blu tak) need to be considered holistically. It's all very well saying that it sounds "ok", but basically, very basically, there's the tracking and resonance aspects to consider if one is looking for best sonic performance from the assembled components. The stated masses of all components is well documented (hey, we have the internet now, it's packed with data...) and all one needs to do is to take cognisance of the cartridge manufacturer's data/requirements and set up the arm etc accordingly. In my opinion there's too much reliance on subjective 'testing' (inexperienced, self believing audiophools) and not enough acceptance/uptake of the use of objective, measured results and the recommendations thereof. Honestly, you see more ridiculous arguments, statements and debates regarding how a certain amp may/may not 'match' a certain speaker (really, try adjusting the tone controls..) and yet the all important cartridge/headshell/arm matching/combinations are not given a second thought. Anyway, we're veering into serious audiophool territory here, and I'm not supposed to be here..
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever..
stevehertz is offline