Thread: FM "deviation"
View Single Post
Old 30th Mar 2010, 9:33 am   #25
G8HQP Dave
Rest in Peace
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
Default Re: FM "deviation"

Quote:
Perhaps longer-term stability was less of a problem with 1980s technology? In the HF world, I have a couple of Sony ICF2010 receivers, and a Liniplex F2 (excellent piece of equipment) that use the phasing method for sideband selection, and none seems to have suffered any deterioration over time in terms of sideband separation.
There is a world of difference between maintaining accurate P and P+90 over 300-3kHz for communications purposes, and the requirements of a decent stereo receiver. Probably the best method for communications is polyphase, but that would be useless for stereo as P is very frequency dependent. Getting accurate phase and amplitude tracking of three signals at F, 38-F and 38+F is hard! Nowadays I suppose you could do it with a digital filter.

Quadrature modulation would be OK, provided that it was an accurate 90 degrees in both transmitter and receiver in order to avoid crosstalk.
G8HQP Dave is offline